Asset classes like data centers, distributed energy and EV charging are now operationally demanding infrastructure systems. These are well-suited as platform investments, delivering inflation-linked returns through scalable, decentralized systems resilient to volatility with durable long-term demand. 

Complexity is rising on three fronts: evolving asset design and configurations; multi-jurisdictional regulation and policy; and technical and regulatory performance requirements embedded into contracts. Data centers and EV charging networks must meet minimum uptime thresholds; distributed energy platforms face emissions limits; and sector-wide, real-time monitoring and sustainability reporting are becoming standard. Underwriting now hinges on grid access, automation, on-site power, regulatory fit and demand certainty. 

For investors, the mid-market remains the most accessible route to high-growth infrastructure themes—from electrification and digitalization, to resilient power. The challenge is not accessing exposure, but managing asset complexity at scale through interdisciplinary capabilities—across energy systems, building design, securing suitable project locations, structured finance and regulatory compliance. 

In this article, we examine three sectors—data centers, distributed energy, and EV charging—that illustrate how asset complexity is evolving. The opportunity set is expanding, but so is the bar for delivering the infrastructure.

Data centers 

Data centers offer institutional investors exposure to cloud computing, AI and enterprise digitalization. These facilities have become foundational infrastructure, underpinning sovereign resilience, business continuity and national competitiveness. While many platforms have scaled into the large-cap segment, mid-sized data centers remain active—and continue to grow in complexity. 

Data centers are among the most capital, energy and operations-intensive assets. Power availability and execution risk—not land or demand—are now the main constraints. Sites need grid connections, on-site energy and resilient procurement. Development timelines depend more on grid capacity than construction speed. 

Operators must manage power pricing volatility, load balancing, tenant sustainability targets and custom fit-outs. Robotics and AI are redefining layouts, cooling systems and power density. While mid-market adoption of robotics lags hyperscalers, targeted use cases—such as automated visitor systems or AI-enabled site monitoring—are demonstrating gains. Fit-outs evolve with each new generation of hardware. 

Managing this complexity demands cross-functional expertise in design, energy integration, finance and engineering. Automation and robotics are enabling scalable, low-latency maintenance and uptime management. On-site renewables, battery storage and microgrids are becoming standard to meet power loads and emissions targets. Effective underwriting now requires anticipating these risks and aligning with grid, emissions and resource-use standards. Investor outcomes depend on how well these risks are anticipated and managed.

Read the full ‘Sponsored Commentary’ article at the link below