Two forces shape the Dutch residential investment landscape more than any others: a structural housing shortage which creates compelling fundamentals and a policy environment in which government intervention is a given and at times hard to navigate. Understanding how these two interact is critical to making the right capital allocation decisions. 

Structural shortage as the demand engine 

The first force, a structural housing shortage, has been a constant factor for the Dutch market. Around 43% of the country’s eight million homes are rental properties, supported by a socially accepted culture of renting across all income levels. This is unusually high by European standards (31%) and ensures a deep and liquid market from an investment perspective. This housing shortage is fueled by above-average annual household growth in the Netherlands of 0.6% over the next 10 years, compared to 0.4% in Europe (Source: CBS, Eurostat). 

Even in recent years, when inflation and rising interest rates hurt the typically low-yielding residential sector, the Dutch market proved resilient. Covid-19 disruptions were temporary and price corrections were milder than in some neighbouring markets, such as Germany. That resilience is not accidental: it stems from a dense population, limited land availability, a professional landscape of developers and owner/operators, low leverage, high occupancy and low arrears. It is also reinforced by a strong macroeconomic backdrop – the Netherlands has outperformed the major economies of the UK, Germany, France and Spain on GDP growth over the past five years, including the Covid period (Source: Oxford Economics, 2025). 

For investors, these fundamentals mean the demand side of the equation is very favorable. However, investment outcomes are not determined by fundamentals alone. The second force, regulation, shapes both what can be built and how returns are achieved.

Read the full ‘Thought Leadership’ article at the link below