Robeco

2018 Top 400 ranking: 94http://www.robeco.com

Request More Information

Robeco

Thought smart beta indices had unlimited capacity? Think again!

1333 thought smart beta indices had unlimited capacity think again

Following smart beta indices is a popular way to implement factor investing. But as money pours into these strategies, capacity issues cast doubt on their ability to keep their promises.

Speed read

• Capacity of smart beta is far lower than some suggest
• Delaying trades would improve feasibility
• Active factor investing strategies have the necessary flexibility

When implementing a strategy, investors and asset managers will necessarily be faced with a number practical hurdles. These hurdles include elements such as direct and indirect transaction costs, constraints regarding the number of trades that can be executed with a certain period for a given security, or simply the management of investment in- and outflows.

As assets under management (AuM) grow, these hurdles only tend to get bigger and can end up having a considerable impact on performance. This is what determines the capacity of an investment strategy or an investment style: the point where additional inflows start weighing on the overall performance of a strategy or style.

The growing popularity of smart beta strategies has led many experts to wonder whether capacity issues might arise sooner or later. A recent study1 by one of the largest providers of smart beta products attempted to answer this question. It concluded that smart beta indices have a huge, almost unlimited, capacity. But we challenge this assertion.

Unfeasible smart beta trades

Indeed, we argue that smart beta trades simply become unfeasible at the AuM levels suggested in the study. Most trades would be ten to 100 times the typical daily volume of the stocks in question. Investors placing buy or sell orders of this size would probably trigger circuit breakers put in place by stock exchanges.

Meanwhile, the study does not consider trade feasibility and only looks at the estimated transaction costs of trades. Using a proprietary model, the authors give examples suggesting that the transaction cost estimates for common trade sizes are similar to those found using other transaction cost models, such as some of those used in the academic literature and even our own proprietary model.

But these models are calibrated for conventional trade sizes, which are typically in the range of 0% to 20% of the average daily transaction volume of a stock. Assuming that the predictions of these kinds of models can be extrapolated to trades bigger than ten to 100 times the typical daily volume of a stock clearly seems far-fetched.

Flexible active factor investing

We also argue that properly designed active factor strategies can provide the high capacity that investors are looking for. The intuition behind this result is that while smart beta indices concentrate all their trades on just a handful of rebalancing dates every year, active factor strategies can trade gradually, making full use of the liquidity that is offered by the market.

In a simulation example, we rebalanced MSCI Minimum Volatility indices gradually by delaying trades. We found no loss in performance but a spectacular improvement in trade feasibility. This holds true not just for MSCI Minimum Volatility indices, but also for other smart beta indices such as MSCI Quality and MSCI Value-weighted indices.

Leave your details and download the paper

Head Office
Weena 850
Rotterdam
3014 DA
The Netherlands
Company website:
http://www.robeco.com
Parent Company:
ORIX Corporation
Year Founded:
1929
No. of investment offices worldwide:
15

Browse this manager's…

What’s new

  • Residualizing Momentum in China

    Residualizing Momentum in China

    White papersWed, 2 Jan 2019

    Previous studies have reported weak results for standard Momentum strategies in China. This paper1 finds that a more sophisticated Momentum strategy does generate significant profits in the Chinese equity market.

  • Rising up against passive S&P 500 strategies

    Rising up against passive S&P 500 strategies

    White papersThu, 20 Dec 2018

    Many equity investors are giving up on active management. In the US, a popular approach is to settle for a passive strategy based on the well-known S&P 500 Index. However, we think factor investing provides a much more compelling alternative.

  • ‘We’re on the cusp of a very positive transformation’

    ‘We’re on the cusp of a very positive transformation’

    White papersTue, 18 Dec 2018

    How fast will sustainability investing become mainstream? Bertrand Badré is a former managing director of the World Bank and the founder of Blue like an Orange Sustainable Capital, a company that invests in sustainable projects in emerging countries. We talked with him about the challenges of sustainable development, the role the private sector can play and the main ideas developed in the book he recently authored on this topic.

  • 1385 a defensive market that is looking increasingly risky

    A defensive market that is looking increasingly risky

    White papersTue, 11 Dec 2018

    Historically, switching to the US is an obvious choice at a late stage of the bull market when a shift towards more defensive equity allocation is desired. However, this time may be different.

  • 1423 robeco quarterly december 2018

    Robeco Quarterly December 2018

    White papersMon, 10 Dec 2018

    The tenth edition of Robeco Quarterly – our quant, sustainability and research magazine – is out.

Search all our content